Sunday, May 26, 2019

Uc Regents vs Bakke Case Brief Essay

Allan Bakke. a thirty-five-year-old white adult male. had twice applied for admission charge to the University of California Medical School at Davis. He was rejected both times. The school reserved 16 topographic points in each come ining category of one 100 for qualified minorities. as fortune of the universitys affirmatory action plan. in an attempt to right longstanding. unjust minority exclusions from the medical business. Bakkes makings ( college GPA and trial tonss ) exceeded those of any of the minority pupils admitted in the two old ages Bakkes applications were rejected. Bakke contended. foremost in the California tribunals. so in the Supreme Court. that he was excluded from admittance entirely on the footing of race. come to the fore Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendments equal protection clause. and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. by practising an affirmatory action policy that resulted in the perennial rejection of Bakkes application for admi ttance to its medical school?Opinion The particular admittances plan is unconstitutional. but race may be considered as a factor in the admittances procedure. Justice Lewis Powell ( J. Powell ) . composing for the tribunal. says that the Supreme Court of the United States ( Supreme Court ) should non pay attending to past favoritism in reexamining the policies of the University. as this is tantamount to leting policy-making tendencies to order constitutional rules. J. Powell determines that accepting a minimal figure of minorities merely to cut down the traditional shortage of such persons in the medical profession is unconstitutional. as it gives penchant to an person on the footing of race entirely.The major finding of the Supreme Court is whether or non racial penchant may be used to advance diverseness of the pupil organic structure. J. Powell argues that puting aside a specified figure of minority slots is non congruous to the purported end minority pupils in themselves do no n vouch a diverseness of point of views in the educational environment. Significance Although race may be a factor in finding admittance to public educational establishments. it may non be a exclusive determining factor.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.